Data Cart

Your data extract

0 variables
0 samples
View Cart
VITAMINC
Took vitamin C, past 12 months

Codes and Frequencies



Can't find the category you are looking for? Try the Detailed codes

Description

VITAMINC reports whether sample adults had taken a vitamin C supplement during the past 12 months. In 1987, 1992 and 2000, VITAMINC was asked of sample adults who had taken any vitamin or mineral supplements in the past 12 months (VITANY). In 2002, VITAMINC was asked of sample adults who had used high dose or megavitamin therapy for their own health or treatment in the past 12 months (VITYR).

Question Wording 

In 1987 and 1992, interviewers asked, "During the past 12 months, did you take any vitamin C?" In 1992, this question and others dealing with the use of particular vitamin/mineral supplements were prefaced with the instruction, "The following questions are about individual vitamins and minerals. Do not include the multi-vitamins you already told me about." The 1987 survey included a similar instruction, which interviewers were told to read if there had been an affirmative response in VITAMULTV (i.e., if the respondent had taken multi-vitamins in the past 12 months).

In 2000, interviewers asked, "During the past 12 months, did you take any vitamin C?" Interviewers were instructed to "read if necessary," "Do not include any vitamin C in the multi-vitamins you told me about. Do not include vitamin C fortified drinks."

In 2002, interviewers asked, "During the past 12 months, did you use high dose or megavitamin therapy for your own health or treatment?" Respondents with an affirmative response (i.e., a "Yes" response in VITYR) were shown a flash card containing a list of vitamins and minerals. They were asked, "During the past 12 months, did you take any of the following vitamins in high dose? You may choose more than one."

Vitamins and Mineral Supplements in NHIS

Vitamin C is one of 12 vitamin/mineral supplements recognized by the NHIS in various years that respondents could report using during the past 12 months.

 

The other such supplements, along with their availability, are:

  • Calcium (VITACALC, 1987, 1992, 2000, 2002, 2005)
  • Vitamin A (only) (VITAMINA, 1987, 1992, 2000)
  • Vitamin E (VITAMINE, 1987, 1992, 2000, 2002, 2005)
  • Multi-vitamin (VITAMULTV, 1987, 1992, 2000, 2002, 2005)

Related Variables on Vitamin C 

In 1987, 1992 and 2000, information was also collected on how long respondents had taken vitamin C. Respondents who gave an affirmative response to the question associated with VITAMINC were asked to report the number of months they had taken vitamin C supplements (VITAMINCMO).

In 1987 only, respondents were asked to report the number of vitamin C pills they took per day (VITYVITCPILS) and the number of milligrams of vitamin C per pill (VITYVITCMG).

In 2000 only, respondents who had taken vitamin C during at least one month in the past 12 months were asked how often they had taken vitamin C in those months (VITAMINCNO), responding as desired in terms of days per week or days per month (VITAMINCTP).

The National Center for Health Statistics recoded data from VITAMINCNO and VITAMINCTP to create two new variables with consistent time units: number of days per week took vitamin C during the relevant months of the past 12 months (VITAMINCDWK), and number of days per month took vitamin C during the relevant months of the past 12 months (VITAMINCDMO). VITAMINCDMO is also available for 1987 and 1992, when it was asked as a direct question (i.e., "About how many days per month did you take vitamin C?").

For more information on the full range of variables dealing with vitamins, see VITANY and VITYR.

Comparability

Apart from universe differences, VITAMINC is fully comparable for 1987, 1992, and 2000.

Researchers should exercise caution, however, when comparing responses to VITAMINC from 2002 to responses from 1987, 1992, or 2000. All variables from 2002 pertaining to the use of particular vitamins/minerals in the past 12 months--including VITAMINC--indicate whether the respondent took the vitamin/mineral as part of high dose or megavitamin therapy.

 

The 2002 Field Representative's Manual defines such therapy as "the use of vitamins in excess of the Recommended Daily Allowances (RDA) established by the National Academy of Sciences, Food and Nutrition Board."

Thus, an affirmative response to VITAMINC in 2002 indicates that the sample adult took vitamin C in high doses. A negative response to VITAMINC in 2002 indicates that the respondent did not take high doses of vitamin C, but does not indicate that he/she took no vitamin C at all in the past 12 months. By contrast, affirmative responses to VITAMINC in 1992 or 2000 indicate that the respondent took any amount of vitamin C in the past 12 months.

Achieving Comparability for 1987 and 2002

In 1987, an affirmative response to VITAMINC also indicates that the respondent took any amount of vitamin C (other than in a multi-vitamin) in the past 12 months. However, the 1987 NHIS included questions that allow users to determine the amount of vitamin C respondents were taking on days when they took vitamin C (VITYVITCPILS and VITYVITCMG). Analysts could use these variables to achieve some level of comparability with VITAMINC for 1987 and 2002.

 

RDAs vary by age group, sex, and pregnancy/lactation status. In 1987, the highest RDA of any group for vitamin C was 60 milligrams. Thus, any respondent in 1987 taking more than that amount of vitamin C in a day would have been considered to be using "high dose or megavitamin therapy" by the above definition offered in the 2002 Field Representative's Manual. (However, by 2002, the Dietary Reference Intake for vitamin C had been revised to 90 milligrams per day.)

Researchers who wish to combine data on vitamin C intake from 1987 with that from 2002 should exercise caution because there is more precision available in the variables from 1987 than in the variables from 2002. In the former year, respondents only provided the dosage amount of vitamins and minerals if they volunteered to get their container of supplements and read the dosage of vitamin C to the interviewer. In 2002, by contrast, "high dose or megavitamin therapy" was user defined to the extent that, although a definition of such therapy was provided in the Field Representative's Manual, the definition was not routinely shared with respondents. Further, respondents were not routinely reading the dosages of the supplements they were taking from a container in 2002.

Universe

  • 1987: Half of sample persons age 18+ (excluded from CACT supplement) who took vitamin/mineral supplements in the past 12 months.
  • 1992: Half of sample persons age 18+ in quarters 1 and 2, and in 2 weeks of quarter 3 (excluded from CACT supplement) who took any vitamin or mineral supplements in past 12 months.
  • 2000: Sample adults age 18+ who took any vitamin or mineral supplements in past 12 months.
  • 2002: Sample adults age 18+ who have used high dose or megavitamin therapy for their health or treatment during the past 12 months.

Availability

  • 1987, 1992, 2000, 2002

Weights